Search This Blog

Sunday, May 17, 2020

Trump: kool-aid, snake oil & genocide

Trump: kool-aid, snake oil & genocide 

or: Thou shalt not Covid thy neighbour

By Ranting Panda, 17 May 2020

The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed just how poor Donald Trump's leadership skills are and how vulnerable the general population is to his madness. The COVID-19 pandemic has so far killed more than 100,000 people in the United States and Trump is yet to display any real compassion. He has been more concerned with spinning the numbers to make it look like he is a war-time president who has kicked the virus's sorry ass. More snowflake than man, Trump is prone to puerile Twitter tantrums when someone dares to challenge his incompetence. Sadly, his hyperbole and hubris have contributed to the massive numbers of casualties experienced in the United States.

Republicans screamed blue murder during the Obama presidency, when four Americans were killed in a terrorist attack on the American embassy in Benghazi, Libya in 2012. Yet, many of these same Republicans now deny Trump has any involvement in the 100,000 COVID-19 deaths, while blaming Obama for the horrendous death toll, even though he hasn't been president for three years. They are too ignorant, too partisan and too gullible to accept that their president is a shit leader who is directly responsible for the deaths of tens of thousands of Americans. But why be non-partisan, when Trump mocked former President, George W. Bush, for daring to suggest that Americans need to ditch partisanship and work together during this crisis (Starks 2020). GWB was not the sharpest tool in the shed, but is a genius compared to the childish and petulant Trump. And just like a petulant little boy, Trump has refused to unveil a portrait of the previous president, Barack Obama. This breaks a 40 year tradition where the new president would unveil a portrait of the previous president (Haltiwanger 2020). Why? Because Obama was far more popular, intelligent and articulate than Trump will ever be, so Trump makes unfounded accusations of an unspecified crime ... just like a little kid envious of a classmate getting better marks.

Before he was elected, Trump said that he could shoot someone in the middle of Fifth Avenue and people would still vote for him. Well, here we are ... and it's not just one death, but more than 100,000 ... and his supporters still defend him. It's one of the few things that Trump told the truth about. Despite claiming to be patriots, it is clear that his followers have no concern for their fellow Americans, and even less concern for anyone who is not American.

Trump's incompetence and arrogance has resulted in a death toll on a genocidal scale. There is a call for Trump to be tried for crimes against humanity over his handling of the pandemic (Da Silva 2020). Throughout the early stages of the crisis, Trump took little action and instead was more snake oil salesman than president, when he peddled a 'miracle treatment', the anti-malarial drug, hydroxychloroquine. Trump fiddled as thousands of Americans died.



The hypocrisy of Trump's supporter base is they claim that politicians should take responsibility for their actions (except Trump), that politicians should tell the truth (except Trump), that politicians should not be corrupt (except Trump), that presidents should be impeached (except Trump) and that even given all of Trump's moral failures ... abortion! Trump banned abortion, which therefore justifies his corruption, moral turpitude, lies, and ineptitude. It is tragically ironic that his supporters still claim to be pro-life, when they clearly don't give a stuff about the 100,000 innocent victims of Trump's incompetence.



Trump claims that Obama left no plans for dealing with such a pandemic. Yet, Obama left a quaint document entitled, 'Playbook for Early Response to High-Consequence Emerging Infectious Disease Threats and Biological Incidents' (Wilson 2020). You can see what the problem with this document is, can't you? It uses big words ... far too big for Trump's grade 4 vocabulary (Burleigh 2018).

Trump has shown exceptionally poor leadership. He has no emotional intelligence. Instead of caring about people, he is more concerned with firing people who he disagrees with. He has shown incredibly juvenile pettiness at seeking revenge on people he doesn't like. He is corrupt and deceitful. His lack of leadership has cost thousands of lives. He can't argue that this was unexpected, as his January and February 2020 intelligence briefings repeatedly warned of the threat of a virus (Miller & Nakashima 2020). Trump's reaction? Tell the public that it isn't a threat, while failing to prepare for the possibility of a pandemic. Trump's actions since he became president in 2017, have exacerbated the impact of COVID-19 in the United States, and potentially globally. Even though Obama left a guide for dealing with such an issue, Trump failed to make any preparations.

Throughout February 2020, Trump failed to take any significant action to limit the spread of the virus. Instead, he went golfing, he continued his juvenile hate tweeting, and firing people who disagreed with him or on whom he was seeking revenge. For the first six crucial weeks after he was notified of the pandemic, he did nothing. This was the time for him to knuckle down and work with health professionals, state governors, to rally the troops; but he did nothing other than procrastinate and deny (Pilkington & McCarthy 2020).

Republican Steve Schmidt compared Trump's press conferences to those of the Iraqi Information Minister, Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf, otherwise known as 'Baghdad Bob' or 'Comical Ali', who became somewhat of a minor celebrity for the ridiculous claims he would make in press conferences during the US invasion of Iraq in 2003. For instance, Trump's denial of the virus's impact is on par with Baghdad Bob, who would often deny the US invasion was occurring, even as US tanks could be seen in the background (Deprang 2013).

Schmidt told MSNBC's Ari Melber that COVID-19 the biggest crisis the world has faced and goes on to describe Trump's response to it as 'the most inept response by the Executive, by the President, I think with regard to any crisis in American history, but certainly any crisis in our lifetimes. And we look at a president who is so clearly in over his head and out of his depth, who has been dishonest, who's been imprecise, who's been inaccurate, and who's deadly indecision will be paid for with the lives of tens of thousands of Americans as this virus escalated to a place where it never need have gone. And that is all because of the wasted month of February where the president was hate-Tweeting, firing people that he was angry with over impeachment, going on campaign rallies and golfing, and now the country is paying the price for that. We should be careful to understand that when the same guy says, 'well, it'll be back in September, but we'll make it go away real quick', is the same guy when there were 15 cases in the country said soon it would be gone to zero and it would disappear like magic. The lack of credibility in these evening news events, is epic and unlike anything we have ever seen. It's a Baghdad Bob show every night of the week. Day after day, the airing of the grievances, the airing of his anger issues, the attacks on the governors we see every night; all the qualities you never, ever want to see in a leader in a crisis where lives are at stake' (Schmidt 2020).

To reinforce Schmidt's caustically correct analysis, Trump tweets about his popularity while more than 100,000 are dead from his dereliction of duty.


Trump accuses his critics of being unhinged and corrupt, yet it is him who is clearly unhinged and blatantly corrupt. Again, with more than 100,000 dead from coronavirus, he claims that he will take down Facebook, Instagram, Twitter and Google because the 'radical left' are in control of those platforms. (The 'radical left' are clearly very tolerant as they must be providing the platform for his deranged tweets).




As the pandemic was taking hundreds of thousands of lives across the globe, and many thousands of lives in the US, Trump denied it was a problem. He suggested just getting a flu shot to treat coronavirus. Incredibly, he even suggested that perhaps people could ingest bleach and irradiate their bodies with UV light, because bleach and sunlight kill viruses (BBC 2020). Following this particularly doltish comment, the Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration issued a warning to people not to ingest disinfectant (Christensen 2020). Not surprisingly, there was a spike in people ingesting disinfectant because of Trump's statement (Sanders & Sommerfeldt 2020).

Drink bleach he says ... more like drink the kool-aid ... and his followers are gullible enough to do it.

The apple doesn't fall far from the tree, as the old adage goes, and nowhere is it more evident than the oafish Trump family. If you thought Donald Trump had an intellect deficiency, then I give you his son ... Eric. Eric Trump believes that coronavirus is a hoax perpetuated by the Democratic Party and it will all go away after the US election on 3 November 2020 (Hawkins 2020). One really has to wonder about the level of stupid in the feral first family. As Forest Gump said, 'Stupid is as stupid does' ... And Trump does a lot of stupid!

Trump has normalised ignorance, manifested by a contempt for education and science. He has ushered in a new Dark Ages, in which the religious right-wing are no better than the superstitious tribes of centuries past. It is ironic that we live in an age with instantaneous access to more information than any society before us and yet ignorance is fashionable, even patriotic. These 'patriotic' followers are whipped into a frenzy through mindless groupthink based around nationalism and religion. It demonises those who are 'different'. It glorifies stupidity over science. It places the bible as the highest law in the land, yet many of Trump's Christian followers completely ignore the very words of the bible ... those things about treating others as you would like to be treated (they call that 'Political Correctness gone mad'), the bible says to share wealth by taking from those who have much and giving to those as they have need (they call this the 'socialist agenda'), the bible says to care for the refugee (they demonise the refugees as terrorists, criminals, rapists, and screech for their imprisonment, torture and banishment).

These same Christians will bang on about how the Book of Revelation warns that the anti-Christ will deceive God's chosen ... and bam! Right in front of our eyes we see them being deceived by a selfish, narcissistic, hate-monger that preys on the vulnerable and boasts incessantly of his own vainglory; clearly anti-christian in his behaviour but supported by Christians the world over. They're not the chosen, they're the deceived.

Just to show how demented some of his followers are, televangelist Pat Robertson claims that COVID-19 is sent by God to punish the world for marriage equality (Quinlan 2020). Yep. The same God who so loved the world that he sent his only begotten son to die in our place for our transgressions, is so filthy about people in love getting married that he has unleashed a pestilence to kill hundreds of thousands of people. Wow!

Forget the faux Christianity of Robertson, let's go to a real Christian. German theologian and anti-fascist, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, penned a letter entitled, 'After ten years'. In it he gives a blunt assessment of groupthink and stupidity that is as appropriate for Nazi Germany, as it is for Trump's America. It isn't just the level of stupid in Trump or his family, or his administration, but also in those who treat Trump as though he is their saviour. How stupid does a person have to be to follow a cretin like Trump! Bonhoeffer's words are incredibly poignant in this post-intellectual world where ignorance and idiocy are glorified:

'Stupidity is a more dangerous enemy of the good than malice. One may protest against evil; it can be exposed and, if need be, prevented by use of force. Evil always carries within itself the germ of its own subversion in that it leaves behind at least a sense of unease in human beings. Against stupidity we are defenseless. Neither protests nor the use of force accomplish anything here; reason falls on deaf ears; facts that contradict one's prejudgement simply need not be believed - in such moments the stupid person even becomes critical - and when facts are irrefutable they are just pushed aside as inconsequential, as incidental. In all this the stupid person, in contrast to the malicious one, is utterly self-satisfied and, being easily irritated, becomes dangerous by going on the attack. For that reason, greater caution is called for when dealing with a stupid person than with a malicious one. Never again will we try to persuade the stupid person with reasons, for it is senseless and dangerous'. (Barnett 2017, p. 22)

'Facts ... are pushed aside as inconsequential' ... remember, when Trump was caught out lying & his press secretary dismissed the facts and tried to spin the lies as 'alternative facts' ... the gullible swallowed this, hook, line and sinker. It was like Bonhoeffer was thinking of Trump when he wrote this: 'In all this the stupid person ... being easily irritated, becomes dangerous by going on the attack'. I can feel another Trump Twitter-storm coming!

Trump dismisses findings of scientists as 'not being balanced' ... think about that ... take all the time you need. Based on Trump's logic, if you're going to teach that the world is round, then you should also teach that it is flat. Whether it be COVID-19, climate change, clean energy, or vaccinations, Trump's anti-intellectual followers have the gall to tell people to do their own research. Of course, research is good ... if it is grounded in actual scientific findings, but their idea of research is to find another anti-intellectual with a dodgy Youtube channel and a moronic conspiracy theory. So let me put it this another way ... all the research conducted by scientific bodies such as the CDC, World Health Organization, NASA, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, can be disproven with a simple Google search conducted by an intrepid half-wit who has been guzzling Trump's kool-aid? I think I'll stick to the quantified, peer-reviewed scientific research, thanks very much. Trump's anti-intellectual idiocy has now extended to him withdrawing funding from the World Health Organization that would have been used to help develop a vaccine against COVID-19 (Woodward 2020). This in itself, is clear evidence of Trump's disdain for science and disregard for human life. His policies are genocidal, but at least his ego gets stroked by showing 'he's the boss'.

How many more lives will this feckless cretin kill because of his incompetence, arrogance, ignorance & corruption. The Trump name will forever be synonymous with moronic behaviour, ineptitude & snout-in-the-trough corruption. Trump didn't drain the swamp, he is the swamp. He rules through nepotism and corruption, firing those who disagree with him and promoting his incompetent family into positions previously reserved people who actually knew what they were doing (Abramson 2018). In the middle of the crisis, rather than showing empathy for the victims of COVID-19, he takes time out to unleash on people who tried to impeach him, even stating, 'The top of the FBI was scum ... human scum' (Connolly 2020). How truly fucked in the head do you have to be to act like this in the worst crisis the world has seen in generations.



Rather than address the horrendous death toll, Trump incites his followers to civil disobedience. While other countries are locking down and socially distancing to prevent the spread of the disease, Trump's followers have marched in large groups to protest the lockdown, putting themselves and others at risk. In a time when we are being warned of the importance of social distance ... to not Covid our neighbour ... these mental giants are getting up close and personal, Covidding their neighbours, putting everyone at risk.

Trump even praised these protesters, describing them as 'good people', when they abused a reporter, accusing him of being an 'enemy of the people' (Lim 2020). This should be a concern to anyone who believes in democracy and free speech. Trump has constantly accused the media of being fake news if they dare to criticise him or his supporters. Trump's presidency has been likened to Hitler's Germany in the early 1930s, when Germans were turned against each other through 'us versus them' hate-speech. By turning Americans against each, Trump isn't a patriot, he is a traitor.  Presidential historian, Jon Meacham, describes Trump as the 'most dangerously ignorant president in history' (Colarossi 2020).

Trump is a wealthy man with the temperament of a five year old child. This is evidenced in his many tweets, where he will often claim to be the 'best in the world, EVER'! He is sexist, racist and bigoted, boasts of sexually assaulting women, demonises refugees, disparages people from other cultures, dog-whistles to white supremacists, is a pathological liar, a bully and a narcissist with an exceptionally fragile ego who can't handle criticism and is always tearing other people down to cover up for his insecurities and incompetence. He is driven by greed rather than a desire to help others, he always has a scapegoat for his shortfalls, he blames others for his misfortunes and mistakes, he hides behind the bible or the flag to justify his bigotry and ignorance, he deals in absolutism and can't grasp nuance or relativism.

So, what sort of people support a person like this?

People just like him.

These people will continue drinking the Trump kool-aid, blaming everybody else for tens of thousands of American deaths ... while Trump treats them like the fools they are, and tragically Americans continue to die because of his benightedness, empowered by the gullible sheep who follow him.

References

Abramson, J 2018, 'Nepotism and corruption: the handmaidens of Trump's presidency', The Guardian, 7 March, viewed 17 May 2020, https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/mar/06/nepotism-corruption-handmaiden-trump-presidency.

Barnett, VJ 2017, After Ten Years: Dietrich Bonhoeffer and our times, Fortress Press, Minneapolis MN.

BBC 2020, 'Coronavirus: Outcry after Trump suggests injecting disinfectant as treatment', BBC News, 24 April, viewed 15 May 2020, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52407177.

Burleigh, N 2018, 'Trump speaks at fourth-grade level, lowest of last 15 U.S. presidents, new analysis finds', Newsweek, 8 January, viewed 17 May 2020, https://www.newsweek.com/trump-fire-and-fury-smart-genius-obama-774169.

Christensen, J 2020, 'Don't eat or inject yourself with disinfectant, warns FDA commissioner', CNN, 23 April, viewed 23 April 2020, https://edition.cnn.com/world/live-news/coronavirus-pandemic-04-23-20-intl/h_1d2d1c2779b624b151a1f72557aabe0d.

Colarossi, S 2020, 'Presidential historian calls Donald Trump the most dangerously ignorant president in history', Politic USA, 18 April, viewed 19 April 2020, https://www.politicususa.com/2020/04/18/presidential-historian-calls-donald-trump-the-most-dangerously-ignorant-president-in-history.html.

Connolly, G 2020, 'Trump brands FBI top brass ‘human scum’, calls CNN reporter ‘brainless’, and says he’s ‘not a fan’ of Mitt Romney in freewheeling press conference', Yahoo News, 20 April, viewed 21 April 2020, https://news.yahoo.com/trump-brands-fbi-top-brass-104641147.html.

Da Silva, C 2020, 'Trump should be tried for 'crimes against humanity' over hydroxychloroquine remarks, says Ohio state rep.', Newsweek, 6 April, viewed 7 April 2020,
https://www.newsweek.com/trump-crimes-against-humanity-hydroxychloroquine-fauci-coronavirus-tavia-galonski-1496280.

Deprang, E 2013, ''Baghdad Bob' and His Ridiculous, True Predictions', The Atlantic, 21 March, viewed 26 April 2020, https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2013/03/baghdad-bob-and-his-ridiculous-true-predictions/274241/.

Haltiwanger, J 2020, 'Trump is refusing to unveil Obama's portrait at the White House, breaking a 40-year tradition', 20 May, viewed 20 May 2020, https://www.businessinsider.com.au/trump-refusing-to-unveil-obama-portrait-at-the-white-house-2020-5.

Hawkins, D 2020, 'Eric Trump claims coronavirus is Democratic hoax, will ‘magically’ vanish after 2020 election', The Washington Post, 18 May, viewed 18 May 2020, https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/05/17/eric-trump-coronavirus/.

Lim, C 2020, 'Trump praised anti-lockdown protesters after they berated and harassed a local reporter', BuzzFeed News, 16 May 2020, viewed 18 May 2020, https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/clarissajanlim/reporter-kevin-vesey-harassed-coronavirus-protest.

Miller, G & Nakashima, E 2020, 'President’s intelligence briefing book repeatedly cited virus threat', The Washington Post, 28 April, viewed 28 April 2020, https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/presidents-intelligence-briefing-book-repeatedly-cited-virus-threat/2020/04/27/ca66949a-8885-11ea-ac8a-fe9b8088e101_story.html

Pilkington, E & McCarthy, T 2020, 'The missing six weeks: how Trump failed the biggest test of his life', The Guardian, 28 March, viewed 15 May 2020, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/mar/28/trump-coronavirus-politics-us-health-disaster.

Quinlan, C 2020, 'Deplorable and bigoted: Televangelist Pat Robertson, COVID-19 is punishment for marriage equality', Buzzflash, 21 April, viewed 22 April 2020, https://buzzflash.com/articles/televangelist-pat-robertson-covid-19-is-punishment-for-marriage-equality.

Sanders, A & Sommerfeldt, C 2020, 'A spike in New Yorkers ingesting household cleaners following Trump’s controversial coronavirus comments', NY Daily News, 24 April, viewed 26 April 2020, https://www.nydailynews.com/coronavirus/ny-coronavirus-new-yorkers-household-cleaners-trump-20200425-rnaqio5dyfeaxmthxx2vktqa5m-story.html.

Schmidt, S 2020, '"Baghdad Don: Trump blasted for most inept response to 'any crisis in history'', MSNBC, aired 16 April, viewed 22 April 2020, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_e7QPuNaZo.

Starks, J 2020, 'Trump mocks George W. Bush's call to push aside partisanship', AOL, 3 May, viewed 18 May 2020, https://www.aol.com/article/news/2020/05/03/trump-mocks-george-w-bushs-call-to-push-aside-partisanship/24187828.

Wilson, C 2020, 'McConnell puts blame for 2020 coronavirus failure on Barack Obama, in office 2009-2017', Yahoo News, 13 May, viewed 15 May 2020, https://news.yahoo.com/coronavirus-trump-mcconnell-blame-obama-pandemic-140217286.html.

Woodward, A 2020, 'Coronavirus: US will not participate in WHO vaccine project after Trump turned against it', The Independent, 24 April, viewed 24 April 2020, https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/coronavirus-vaccine-who-project-trump-us-covid-19-a9483421.html.

Updated 31 May 2020

Michael Moore's Planet of the Humans - fact, fiction & the future

Michael Moore's Planet of the Humans - fact, fiction & the future

By Ranting Panda, 17 May 2020

American filmmaker, Michael Moore, has produced another controversial documentary. This one is called Planet of the Humans. Jeff Gibbs provides the dulcet narration.

The film makes several claims which have angered environmentalists and warmed the cockles of right-wing hearts across the globe. Many of those claims are false or misrepresentations. However, Moore also makes a number of claims which are spot on, but which his new-found friends of the right-wing conveniently ignore.

In summary, Moore claims that renewable energy, particularly solar, wind and biomass, are as damaging for the environment as coal-fired energy generation. He does make some good points, particularly around mining practices and slavery, as well as the fact that humans cannot continue exploiting the world's non-renewable resources. He correctly points out that current attempts by governments and industrialists to introduce renewable energy is aimed at continuing unsustainable and exploitative production practices in the name of consumerism and capitalism. However, much of his claims about the environmental costs of renewable energy are either false, reference old technology or lack consideration of life-cycle assessment.

Ronnie Brakels has provided an excellent critique of Moore's claim that renewables are as damaging as fossil fuels, by stating that it is tantamount to claiming that bicycles are as bad for the environment as cars (Brakel 2020). After all, bicycles are manufactured using coal, iron ore and environmentally damaging mining and production processes; bikes can only be ridden on sunny days for relatively short distances, so riders will often have a car as a back-up form of transport; and the people who ride bikes need food, which causes environmental damage through agricultural practices. Even the most sceptical anti-environmentalist would find it difficult to seriously argue that bikes are as environmentally damaging as cars, or that they produce as much pollution. Yet, this is the nature of Moore's claim when he states that renewable technologies consume iron ore and coal, and that they require existing electricity grids to supplement their usage on cloudy days.

Moore misses the point that while fossil fuels and mining may be involved in the production of renewable energy products, such as solar panels, wind turbines, and electric vehicles, once they are in operation their consumption of fossil fuels is negligible compared to the operation of coal fired power plants and fossil-fuel powered cars; not dissimilar to the push-bike example provided by Brakels.

The key thing lacking in Michael Moore's argument is Life-cycle Assessment (LCA), which is a cradle-to-grave analysis of the environmental impact of a product. At its most basic, LCA calculates how much carbon is produced in the manufacture and operation of a product with the amount of carbon removed or offset by the product. Moore embraces the climate change denialist rationale that all green technology is claimed to be carbon-free, while failing to understand the basic concept of carbon neutral or carbon negative. That is, that green technology is not carbon free, but that the carbon dioxide emitted in its production and operation is much less than the carbon removed or offset by the product or the carbon-free energy generated over the life of the product, thus reducing the amount of electricity required to be produced by coal-fired power stations.

Moore makes the outdated claim that the energy generated by solar panels over their life-time does not cover the energy taken to produce them in the first place. He also argues that solar panels have a life expectancy of 10 years. Both of these claims are false. Solar panels have a life expectancy of up to 30 years, with an energy payback period of two years (Parkinson 2013). So it takes two years for a solar panel to recoup the energy taken to produce it, while then generating at least another 28 years of clean energy without further consumption of coal. How can that possibly be as bad as a coal-fired power plant that continues consuming coal and producing dirty energy for those 28 years? Many solar panel manufacturers offer 25 year warranties (Energy Informative n.d.). Even after 25 years, the panels' output is around 80% (Stahley 2019).

Solar panel payback period, life expectancy and energy output (Adapted from Parkinson 2013)

Moore tries to justify his inaccurate claims by highlighting a couple of concerts that promoted sustainability, yet ended up being powered by the coal-generated electricity grid. He seems to not grasp the concept that at this point, solar and wind are not yet capable of completely replacing coal-fired power stations ... but we are getting there. Moore has this short-sighted view that renewables will not replace coal, that they are always going to be dependent on coal for meeting demand. This is not true. Many countries and states are increasingly utilising renewable energy for electricity generation and greatly reducing their reliance on fossil fuels. Many countries have committed to 100% renewable energy for electricity generation by 2050, including Costa Rica, Denmark, Bangladesh, Kenya, Philippines, Portugal, Sri Lanka and Sweden (REN21 2019, pp 194-196). Scotland has achieved 98% use of renewables through wind power, while Uruguay is almost at 100% renewables, and Denmark is generating more than half its electricity from renewables (Climate Council 2019).

Raconteur (2018)
One thing of crucial importance that Moore did identify, was the matter of unethical mining practices. The world is currently experiencing more people in slavery that at any time in history, with more than 40 million people in slavery and more than 150 million exploited through child labour (International Labour Organization 2017). Moore's documentary does show that mining is an industry that has significant levels of slavery in it. This is an issue that must be addressed regardless of whether the products manufactured from it are solar panels, components in coal-fired power stations, batteries, cars or mobile phones. Every supply chain is at risk of modern slavery and there are efforts underway to address this.

Moore does make a good point about bio-mass, however, not all bio-mass comes from living trees; some of it is from waste wood that is decaying and therefore, releasing carbon anyway. Nonetheless, wood chipping forests as a form of renewable energy is not sustainable, as plants and forests absorb carbon. While biomass is not an acceptable form of renewable energy, Moore's focus on it blows it way out of proportion. In 2019, biomass accounted for 1% of the United States energy mix and 5% of Europe's energy mix (Yale Climate Connections 2020). If the world wishes to continue using biomass and biogas, it can be done far more efficiently with less environmental damage, through the use of hemp. This is a crop that is fast growing, requires less land, causes less environmental damage and yields up to 120% more energy than other forms of biomass (Prade et al 2011).

For all of its hyperbole, the doco provides little in the way of alternative solutions. In relation to energy alternatives, it seems to suggest continuing the use of fossil fuels. The world is being destroyed by the use of unsustainable fossil fuels, and Moore appears to advocate for continuing these practices.

One thing that Moore does get right is the need to reduce consumption. Capitalist economies are driven by consumerism, at the expense of other people and the environment. Slavery is the worst it has ever been as capitalists pursue excessive profits at the expense of the world's most vulnerable, through ever-increasing consumerism that is driven by greed for unnecessary products designed for short life expectancy through obsolence or perceived obsolence.

By the year 2000, consumption of iron ore had increased more than 1000% over the previous 100 years. In the first, 20 years of the 21st century, it increased a further 2000% (Callier 2018). During this time, carbon dioxide emissions have increased by 1500%, while water use, coal production and crop harvests increased between 500% and 1000%. These increases are unprecedented in history. Apart from increasing waste and environmental degradation, the dramatic increase in demand for raw materials is likely to result in resource scarcity, resulting in conflict and war (Callier 2018).

Callier (2018)
Some may see the documentary as championing fossil fuels, discrediting renewable technology and
justifying climate change denialism. However, the documentary's criticism of unfettered consumerism demonstrates the need for the planned international economy envisioned by Karl Marx. Our modern society has more knowledge of people's needs than ever before. Big data combined with artificial intelligence can be used to forecast production requirements to address everyone's needs and temper excess consumption. Robotics and additive manufacturing can produce those requirements efficiently using green technology. While robotics and additive manufacturing could cost jobs, ultimately, people will not need to work in such a world where their needs are forecast and met. This will fulfil another of Marx's ideas around a planned economy not requiring money. Yes, we could provide everyone a minimum living wage, however, this would just be a step on the path to doing away with money altogether. Why have money when our needs are already met through the power of big data, AI and robotics.

Moore states that renewable technology will not save the world. He is correct: renewable energy alone will not save the world, however, renewables must replace fossil fuels and be coupled with managing demand and reducing excessive consumption to ensure that the world remains liveable for future generations.

The world cannot continue exploiting people or the environment. It cannot continue using fossil fuels, which are limited resources, damage the environment and drive climate change through carbon emissions. The documentary may have been music to the ears of industrialists, climate change denialists and fossil fuel warriors, however, the puerile claim that renewable energy is as environmentally damaging as fossil fuels is naive and ignorant.

The world must continue developing and improving renewable technology to reduce social and environmental impacts, while society needs to reduce demand for unnecessary products that drive environmental degradation through their production and waste. At the same time, we must address abusive labour practices, in which more than 40 million people are in modern slavery, more than 150 million in child labor, and millions more exploited for low wages and horrendous working conditions.

References

Brakel, R 2020, 'Michael Moore attacks renewable industry by detonating his own credibility', Solarquotes Blog, 1 May, viewed 3 May 2020, https://www.solarquotes.com.au/blog/planet-of-humans-review/.

Callier, V 2018, 'The quickening pace of global metabolism', Knowable Magazine, 29 June, viewed 16 May 2020, https://www.knowablemagazine.org/article/sustainability/2018/quickening-pace-global-metabolism.

Climate Council 2019, '11 countries leading the charge on renewable energy', 13 January, viewed 11 May 2020, https://www.climatecouncil.org.au/11-countries-leading-the-charge-on-renewable-energy/.

Energy Informative n.d., 'The real lifespan of solar panels', viewed 16 May 2020, https://energyinformative.org/lifespan-solar-panels/.

International Labour Organization 2017, '40 million in modern slavery and 152 million in child labour around the world', 19 November, viewed 4 May 2020, https://www.ilo.org/global/about-the-ilo/newsroom/news/WCMS_574717/lang--en/index.htm.

Parkinson, G 2013, 'Graph of the Day: Myth of solar PV energy payback time', Renew Economy, 15 March, viewed 10 May 2020, https://reneweconomy.com.au/graph-of-the-day-myth-of-solar-pv-energy-payback-time-22167/.

Prade, T, Svensson, S, Andersson, A, Mattsson, JE 2011, 'Biomass and energy yield of industrial hemp grown for biogas and solid fuel', ScienceDirect, Biomass and bioenergy vol 35 (2011) 3040 e3049, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251627798_Biomass_and_energy_yield_of_industrial_hemp_grown_for_biogas_and_solid_fuel/link/5ac3287aaca27222c75d317a/download.

Raconteur 2018, 'Energy Transition', Raconteur, viewed 16 May 2020, https://res.cloudinary.com/yumyoshojin/image/upload/v1/pdf/responsible-business-2018.pdf.

REN21 2019, 'Renewables 2019 - Global Status Report', viewed 11 May 2020, https://www.ren21.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/gsr_2019_full_report_en.pdf.

Stahley, B 2019, 'Commercial solar panel degradation: What you should know and keep in mind', Sunpower, 1 August, viewed 16 May 2020, https://businessfeed.sunpower.com/articles/what-to-know-about-commercial-solar-panel-degradation.

Yale Climate Connections 2020, 'Michael Moore's 'Planet of the Humans' documentary attacks climate solutions', Ecowatch, 1 May, viewed 3 May 2020, https://www.ecowatch.com/michael-moore-climate-denial-2645892109.html.